🔗 Share this article

The last time the Russian President traveled to India in the previous decade, the global landscape was markedly different. The brief visit, curtailed by the pandemic, focused on discussions on economic and military ties between the two leaders.

Not long after, the large-scale military offensive of its neighbor would transform the Russian leader into a figure of international condemnation, significantly restricting his overseas engagements.

Furthermore, that period preceded a major change in ties between Washington and Delhi, marked by contentious statements and the imposition of substantial import duties.

"In this context, the significance of Putin's journey to engage with the Indian PM cannot be overstated, serving as a symbol of resilient relations and a defiance of external pressure," experts emphasize.

A Critical Juncture for Both Nations

The summit occurs at a crucial time. President Putin comes after dismissing latest peace proposals for Ukraine, confident due to claimed advances by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the primary importance of this engagement is its simple happening," commented a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It suggests a return to a form of routine global diplomacy."

For India, the stakes are particularly elevated. The country faces a difficult geopolitical climate, characterized by a less engaged United States, a weakened Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

The tightrope walk was underscored just before the visit, when European ambassadors published a public commentary questioning Russia's commitment to peace. This elicited a firm response from Indian officials, who labeled it an inappropriate diplomatic practice.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The historical partnership dates back to the Soviet period and is deeply entrenched, with Moscow historically being Delhi's primary defense supplier. This relationship was largely tolerated by the West until a recent shift.

For years, Western nations overlooked India's substantial purchases of cheap energy from Russia. Yet, in the wake of stalled diplomacy, pressure mounted, leading to punitive tariffs and a major chill in transatlantic relations with Delhi.

"Consequently, India has returned to its default strategy of maintaining multiple options," noted a strategic analyst. "This demonstrates to the US that it has alternatives and is observing how the situation unfolds."

Apart from international politics, India's fundamental concern with Russia is geography. "China remains the greatest threat to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a continental balancer against China," the analyst added.

The strengthening partnership between Russia and China has raised alarms in Delhi, prompting efforts to prevent an unbreakable bond between its northern neighbor and its traditional ally.

This apprehension has also spurred India's drive to reduce its military imports, decreasing its dependence on Russian equipment from a dominant share to a reduced portion in the past few years.

"India will attempt to find a middle ground: buy sufficient Russian weaponry to maintain the alliance, but not become so dependent that a supply disruption would cripple its defenses," the analyst concluded.

The Oil Question

Increased trade relations is likely to be a key agenda item. President Putin has recently emphasized plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "higher plane", defying Western sanctions.

The matter of crude oil imports remains central. Although the Indian government has stated to continue buying Russian oil, recent restrictions have slowed activity from the private sector. Simultaneously, India has moved to increase imports of US energy.

A Kremlin spokesperson acknowledged "obstacles" in economic cooperation but said it would continue uninterrupted. The official downplayed the impact of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "minor" and "temporary" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "technology" to bypass such measures.

Diplomatic Constraints

When the two leaders sit down, the topic of Ukraine is expected to be mentioned mainly through India's consistent appeal for a peaceful resolution.

"While the Indian leader has access to both sides, the nation lacks the diplomatic clout to significantly influence the war," the analyst said. "Beyond urging negotiations, its capacity to make a difference is limited."

In the end, notwithstanding the visible friendship between the two leaders, the relationship is fundamentally one of "pure realpolitik," guided by cold calculation in a rapidly changing world.